This act is a freedom of speech case because it is conveying the message that you earned certain achievement that other people actually struggled and suffered to obtain. Wearing these awards basically slanders everything that these honorable people went through and stand for.
In this article, it also mentions the fact that, by law, you may not receive financial support if you do not rightfully deserve it. This is also covered under the first amendment for the same reasons as wearing false medals. It conveys a message that is untrue and therefor can be taken to court.
URL (picture): https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/purple-heart.jpg?quality=75&strip=color&w=1100
Very intriguing. I had never heard of a case like this, and I completely agree that by wearing something this you are falsely advertising that you earned it. Although I do think it fringes upon freedom of expression if we were to not allow people to wear what they want no matter what it says about them.
ReplyDelete